Nano-Bubble Hydrogen Water Shows Superior Antioxidant Power vs Regular H2

Authors
Journal
Materials Science and Engineering C
Year
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2015.03.064
Study Type
Molecular Assay
Outcome
Positive
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Country
Japan
Health Condition
Oxidative Stress
Body System
Whole Body

TL;DR

Nano-bubble hydrogen water is better at neutralizing harmful molecules than other types of hydrogen water, even when they have similar hydrogen levels.

Key Finding

Nano-bubble hydrogen water showed superior hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity compared to conventional hydrogen water and pure water in laboratory tests, with the nano-bubble structure appearing more important than dissolved hydrogen concentration alone.

Summary

Researchers created water containing tiny hydrogen bubbles (smaller than 717 nanometers) and tested whether it could neutralize harmful molecules called hydroxyl radicals. Using two different laboratory tests, they compared this nano-bubble hydrogen water to regular water, tap water, and other types of hydrogen water. The nano-bubble version showed the strongest ability to neutralize hydroxyl radicals and demonstrated antioxidant activity (the ability to prevent damage from oxidation), suggesting that the bubble structure itself may be more important than just the amount of dissolved hydrogen.

Practical Takeaway

This is a laboratory study only—it does not involve human testing or real-world conditions. While the results suggest nano-bubble hydrogen water may have stronger antioxidant properties in test tubes than other types of hydrogen water, this does not yet demonstrate health benefits in people. Much more research, including human trials, would be needed before any health claims could be made.

Abstract (excerpt)

We prepared nano-bubble hydrogen-dissolved water (nano-H water) which contained hydrogen nano-bubbles of <717-nm diameter for 54% of total bubbles. In the DMPO-spin trap electron spin resonance (ESR) method, the DMPO-OH:MnO ratio, being attributed to amounts of hydroxyl radicals (OH), was 2.78…

Read the full abstract via DOI